
Chapter 15 penalties and holding SARS Accountable
This discussion examines the critical distinction between objecting to a SARS penalty assessment and requesting remittance under the South African Tax Administration Act.
It unpacks the interaction between sections 104, 215, 220, and 224, highlighting why taxpayers may first need to seek remittance before pursuing objection and appeal remedies and explores the procedural and evidentiary consequences of each route, particularly the shifting onus of proof in understatement penalty disputes and administrative penalties before SARS and the Tax Court.























